Alex Salmond: Former SNP leader and Lawyer’s Statements on Nicola Sturgeon and ‘Tawdry Business’ as Legal Action Launched Against Scottish Government

legal action against Scottish Government

Alex Salmond: Legal action against Scottish Government, the Alba Party leader is alleging “misfeasance” by civil servants and is seeking damages and loss of earnings.

The public officials and ministers named in the action include former permanent secretary Leslie Evans, ex-chief of staff Liz Lloyd, and former first minister Nicola Sturgeon.

Alex Salmond: Former SNP leader and Lawyer’s Statements

Alex Salmond: Former SNP leader and Lawyer's StatementsNicola Sturgeon is among the prominent officials accused of “misfeasance” in former First Minister Alex Salmond’s new legal case against the Scottish government.In 2019.

Mr Salmond sued the government and was granted £512,000 for mishandling harassment charges against him.The former SNP leader, who served as first minister from 2007 to 2014, was cleared of sexual assault charges in a separate criminal trial in 2020.

The Alba Party leader is now accusing civil servants of “misbehaviour” and pursuing damages and lost pay in what he calls a “day of reckoning for the Scottish government.”

On Friday, the Court of Session heard the Alex Salmond v Scottish Ministers case.Former permanent secretary Leslie Evans, ex-chief of staff Liz Lloyd, and former first minister Nicola Sturgeon are among the public officers and ministers named in the case.

Mr Salmond said in a statement after the case was called that “not one single person has been held accountable” for what he called a “tawdry business” that encompassed a judicial review, criminal trial, and Holyrood investigation.

He declared that he would https://thegazettengr.com/oscar-pistorius-granted-parole/ having “done my talking in court or in front of parliament”.Mr. Salmond continued, “Not a single person has been held accountable despite Lord Pentland’s findings in the Court of Session that the behaviour of the former permanent secretary and her officials was ‘unlawful’, ‘unfair’, and ‘tainted by apparent bias’; despite the ongoing inquiries by the police and Crown Office into the criminal leaks and possible perjury at the criminal trial.

Despite the shocking revelations of mismanagement contained in the eventual publication of the government’s own legal advice; and despite the specific findings of the parliamentary inquiry into the conduct of the former permanent secretary and the former first minister.

Mr. Salmond declared that he would postpone the case’s development, or “stinging,” to enable criminal inquiries into allegations of perjury and leaks to occur.

He nevertheless stated: “However, the calling of the action signals that the day of reckoning for the Scottish government’s record of misfeasance on this grand scale will inevitably come.”

Following two complaints from staff members—including former ministers—under a newly established complaints mechanism, Mr. Salmond was the subject of an investigation by the Scottish government.

A judicial review determined that the investigation was “tainted with apparent bias” after the Scottish government admitted defeat, and Mr Salmond was granted £512,000 as a result.Following a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh, he was acquitted of more than a dozen accusations of sexual misconduct, including attempted rape.

Following that, a Holyrood inquiry into the Scottish government’s treatment of the original two complaints was launched, with both Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon asked to give evidence. Mr Salmond targeted Scotland’s previous senior civil servant, then-permanent secretary Ms Evans, during the inquiry, accusing her of having a “bias” against him and pushing for her resignation.

Mr Salmond stated his intention to sue Ms Evans in March 2021, only days before announcing his leadership of the tiny Alba Party. The probe, which strained Mr Salmond’s previously tight relationship with Ms Sturgeon, found Ms Sturgeon misled MSPs in her testimony, although she was cleared of any breaches of the ministerial code.

“This is an action of misfeasance in public office in which we aver that public officials of the Scottish government conducted themselves improperly, in bad faith, and beyond their powers, with the intention of injuring Mr Salmond,” said Mr Salmond’s lawyer, Gordon Dangerfield.

“We allege that public officials decided early on that Mr Salmond would be found guilty of the allegations against him, regardless of the facts.”

“As incidents unfolded, we allege that public officials then participated in the criminal leaking of confidential documents, the concealment of documents in defiance of court orders and a criminal warrant, the misrepresentation of the court during judicial review proceedings, the solicitation of false criminal complaints, and, finally, the commission of perjury at a parliamentary inquiry.”

“All of this, we aver, was done for political reasons, and specifically to injure Mr Salmond.” Mr Dangerfield said that several papers requested in relation to the allegations “continue to be concealed by the Scottish government” throughout the last year.

He went on to say: “A major aim of Mr Salmond in bringing this action is to obtain disclosure of this vital evidence and to blow apart the Scottish government cover-up which has gone on now for far too long.” The Scottish government, according to First Minister Humza Yousaf, would “robustly” defend itself.

Mr Yousaf initially refused to comment on the case during a press conference at the British-Irish Council in Dublin on Friday, but later added, “Unsurprisingly to anyone listening or watching, the Scottish government will defend its position robustly, but I’ll say no more because that’s a live case.”

Leave a Reply