When You Create a crisis online, it’ll Translate to a crisis offline
- During a TGNEWS-organized public lecture, Professor Umar Pate, Vice Chancellor of Federal University Kashere, warns about the dangers of irresponsible journalism.
- Pate emphasises the dangers of spreading misinformation, especially online, and how it can lead to real-world crises, chaos, and violence across communities.
- The seasoned broadcaster advocates for adherence to journalistic principles, the training of online journalists, and the importance of responsible storytelling to foster peace and understanding in Nigeria.
In the hallowed halls of Lelewal Hotels in Yola, Professor Umar Pate, the erudite Vice Chancellor of Federal University Kashere, embarked on a mesmerising journey of words during a public lecture hosted by TGNEWS.
His discourse, akin to a literary odyssey, unfolded with a wisdom-laden narrative, delving into the intricacies of contemporary journalism and the perils it poses in the digital age.
Prof. Pate’s eloquence painted a vivid tableau, cautioning against the treacherous terrain of irresponsible journalism.
Like a master storyteller, Pate illuminated the dangers of disseminating misinformation, an act tantamount to planting seeds of discord that, if left unchecked, could blossom into tangible crises.
His words reverberated in the minds of his audience as he skillfully articulated the potential fallout of false narratives on the nation’s social fabric, igniting chaos and bloodshed across communities.
In the tapestry of his discourse, Pate interwove the essential elements of good journalism—credibility, truthfulness, and reliability—casting them as the guiding lights for media practitioners navigating the labyrinth of the digital realm.
Through the lens of his narrative, he underscored the profound impact that a journalist’s storytelling prowess can have on the psychological makeup of society, urging practitioners to exercise caution in crafting narratives that transcend the virtual space and bleed into the real world.
As the narrative unfolded, Pate’s words took on the hues of a cautionary tale, a chronicle of warnings to journalists venturing into the online landscape. His voice, resonant with the gravitas of experience, became a beacon for those navigating the turbulent waters of digital journalism.
With each carefully chosen word, he urged journalists to resist the allure of sensationalism, reminding them that the consequences of their stories could reverberate far beyond the confines of the internet, permeating the very essence of societal harmony.
In the midst of technological upheaval, Pate’s narrative took an introspective turn.
He traversed the landscape of ethical standards, urging media professionals not to succumb to the temptations brought forth by the digital revolution.
The once-familiar terrain of advertising had undergone a seismic shift, and Pate, with a tinge of nostalgia, lamented the challenges faced by traditional media in adapting to the dynamic landscape.
Yet, like a protagonist facing adversity, he expressed hope that local organisations armed with the right tools and intellectual acumen could not only survive but thrive on the global stage.
In the intricate web of his discourse, Pate delved into the multifaceted challenges faced by conventional media organisations, grappling with issues of credibility, funding, and intellectual prowess.
Prof. Pate’s narrative became a symphony of concerns, echoing the struggles of media outlets to maintain relevance in an era dominated by tech giants such as Google and Amazon.
The professor’s voice, a melodic blend of concern and optimism, resonated with a call for resilience, encouraging media organisations to embrace technological advancements as windows connecting them with the wider world.
The lecture unfolded as a reflection on the evolving dynamics of the media landscape, with Pate casting himself as both a commentator and a visionary.
His words echoed the sentiments of an industry in flux, where the reach, revenue, and resilience of media organisations hinged on their ability to adapt and embrace technological innovations.
Pate’s narrative became a rallying cry for the industry to evolve, to leverage the advantages of technology, and to equip itself with the tools necessary to compete on a global scale.
As the discourse transitioned towards a resolution, Pate’s narrative evolved into a poignant reflection on the impact of misinformation on national unity.
With the empathy of a sage, he observed the divisive narratives propagated by irresponsible journalism, narratives based on ethnicity and religion rather than merit and objectivity.
His voice, a clarion call for introspection, lamented the unhealthy state of a nation where people spoke not based on shared values but along tribal and religious lines.
In the final chapters of his discourse, Professor Pate assumed the role of a visionary, offering a solution to the challenges laid bare.
The professor advocated for the training of online journalists, equipping them with the principles of good journalism within the broader context of global standards.
His words became a roadmap for a future where responsible journalism could be the linchpin for fostering peace and tranquilly in Nigeria.
The conclusion of this literary journey saw Professor Umar Pate, recognised for his unwavering dedication, standing alongside other luminaries as characters in the grand tapestry of societal acknowledgement.
The tale concluded with a call to arms—a call for journalists to not only be proficient storytellers but also guardians of truth, weaving narratives that contribute to the mending of the societal tapestry torn by the winds of misinformation.
In this grand narrative, Prof. Pate’s words lingered, echoing the importance of responsible journalism as a catalyst for unity and understanding in the intricate mosaic of Nigerian society.