Mike Sielski: You think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Will Ruin the Super Bowl? Please. The NFL Could Use More Tay Tay

You think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce will ruin

Mike Sielski: You think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Will Ruin, the City of Philadelphia Like you, assuming you are a normal human being who lives an actual life rather than someone who spends so much time online that you haven’t seen natural light fall on your face since the summer of 2019, I am perplexed by the Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce “controversy.”

If I understand correctly, here are the basic dynamics of this thing: The superstar tight end, who resembles a well-groomed lumberjack, and the superstar singer/songwriter, who appears to be somewhat humble and self-effacing in comparison to other famous singer/songwriters, have fallen in love.

Mike Sielski: You think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Will Ruin the Super Bowl? Please. The NFL Could Use More Tay Tay

You think Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Will RuinAnd, because the NFL and its rights-holding networks see Swift’s close relationship with the world’s top pop-culture figure as an opportunity to boost ratings and extend pro football’s fan base, those networks are directing their cameras on her during games while she cheers for Kelce.

And, with Kelce and the Kansas City Chiefs facing the San Francisco 49ers in the Super Bowl next Sunday, Swift’s appearance at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas – provided she can make it in time for kickoff following a concert in Tokyo – will almost certainly be addressed.

People are bothered by Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce because no one in this country can just shrug their shoulders and ask, “Why is this supposed to bother me?” People who enjoy Taylor Swift’s music aren’t the ones who are bothered here.

People who appreciate football and only football, who consider themselves to be macho men, and who do not want their football or manliness tainted by even the tiniest mention of a beautiful, talented, and accomplished woman are, in general, the ones who are offended by this. That is absurd.

For starters, when it comes to popularity, societal importance, and power, the 6-foot-5, 250-pound, Hall of Fame-bound tight end is the beta in this equation. Taylor Swift is not Travis Kelce’s girlfriend.

Travis Kelce is Taylor Swift’s boyfriend. There is a distinction. For another thing, the idea that the Super Bowl will be spoiled because of too much emphasis on Swift is absurd. The game has a lot going for it already. There’s an intriguing battle between the defending champions (the Chiefs) and the NFC’s best club (the 49ers).

Even more intriguing is the contrast between the best quarterback in the league (Patrick Mahomes) and the finest quarterback narrative in the league (Brock Purdy). The entire experience of watching the Super Bowl includes the entertainment value of the game, the entertainment value of the ads, the social contact with friends, and your sister’s incredible buffalo chicken dip.

And, as The New York Times previously stated, “the reality is Ms. Swift typically [is] onscreen for less than 25 seconds for broadcasts that run longer than three hours.”

How about twenty-five seconds? That is less time than it takes her boyfriend’s brother to down a six-pack. She won’t be on TV long enough to spoil anything unless you believe any mention of her is cause for indignation, in which case I recommend you consult a good psychologist.

I believe that any NFL game would be better if the cameras focused more on Swift and less on a variety of people, issues, and features that are considerably more unpleasant and uninteresting.

I would gladly take more Tay Tay in exchange for reducing or eliminating any of the following aspects that will undoubtedly be part of CBS’s coverage and telecast of Super Bowl LVIII: — Tony Romo. –

Jim Nantz. – Jim Nantz, Tony Romo. – The full cast of The NFL Today. The insincere, forced laughing. The trite and obvious commentary. Get rid of them all. Simply put on a college basketball game or two, then bring in James Brown 15 minutes before kickoff to set the stakes.

The betting advertisements. Okay, I get it. This is a billion-dollar industry. It is the major way in which millions of people enjoy sports nowadays. They do not desire human-interest stories. They do not wish to learn anything personal about the players, coaches, or their families.

They simply want to know what the algorithmic probabilities are for Harrison Butker to make a 56-yard field goal inside a domed stadium in the Pacific Time Zone with the geo-thermostat set at 71.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Many of them wind up becoming gambling addicts. Again, I understand. This is the current state of the world. I think it’s icky.

Any reference to “analytics” in a fourth-and-short circumstance. Stop being reductive. Stop dumbing things down. You are a professional broadcaster. You are supposed to be an expert in both football and communication.

If you can’t explain to viewers, rationally and in layman’s terms, why you believe a team should or should not go for it on fourth down, you should look for another job. – Halftime interviews with head coaches. Sideline reporters are valuable. At their best, they deliver real-time updates and information pertinent to the game’s plot and outcome.

Are the teammates fighting between themselves? What happened to the linebacker who staggered off the field a couple of plays ago? Those components of the job are important. Eliciting one more.

We need to stop the run in the second half. – Anything relating to State Farm Insurance. – Anything relating to erectile dysfunction. See? We just cleared enough time for at least another five to ten minutes of Swiftie concentration. Don’t you like it? Are you still bothered? Shake it off. There will always be another Super Bowl next year.

 

 

Leave a Reply